For attorneys and law firms
Receive the evidence without downloading it. Send it on with a record.
Most attorneys meet MyCaseViewer because an investigator sent them a link. It opens in your browser, nothing installs, and nothing lands on your firm's network. The same thing works in the other direction: send a demand package, a client's file or an expert's material, and keep a record of what was delivered, to whom, and when it was opened.
When your investigator sends you a case
You need nothing from us to open a delivery. No account, no licence, no call to your IT department.
When the file has to go further
Case material rarely stops with one reader. It goes to the client, to co-counsel, to an expert, to a mediator — and each of those hops is a question someone may ask you about later.
The demand package, start to finish
If your firm sends demand packages to adjusters, this is the workflow the product was shaped for — and the recipient is exactly the kind of reader whose employer blocks downloads.
- 1
Put the whole package on one link
The demand letter, the records, the bills, the scene photos, an hour of dashcam or a settlement video. Nothing is attached to an email, so nothing bounces off the carrier's mail server for being too large, and the adjuster is not asked to reassemble six messages in the right order.
- 2
Give each reader their own link
The adjuster, their supervisor, defence counsel. Every open and download is attributed to the person whose link was used, and one link can be revoked without disturbing the others — useful when a file moves to a different adjuster mid-negotiation.
- 3
Find out the moment it is opened
An email the first time each recipient opens the package. On a time-limited demand, that is the difference between wondering whether it landed and knowing which day the clock really started running.
- 4
Be able to prove it arrived
The Certificate of Delivery lists what was sent, to whom, and when each item was first opened, with IP and device. Seal the package as well and each file carries a fingerprint that anyone can recompute, so "we never received that version" stops being an argument worth having.
What it does not do, before you ask
- No Bates numbering and no redaction. This delivers and records; it does not prepare documents. Redact and stamp in whatever you use today, then send the finished files.
- It is not your document management system. There are no matter numbers, conflicts checks or docketing here, and files expire on a schedule you set. Keep your own master copy — your retention obligations are yours, and a delivery link is not an archive.
- PDFs, images, video, .docx and .xlsx never leave our infrastructure. Only legacy formats — .doc, .ppt, HEIC photos, unusual video — are converted by a third party so they can display, and an account setting turns that off entirely, in which case those files are offered as a download instead. Medical records arriving as PDFs are never in that path.
The questions that decide whether this helps you
- The other side says the video was edited. What can I actually show?
- If the delivery was sealed: the SHA-256 fingerprint recorded for that file at the time it was sealed, and a timestamp proving that fingerprint existed before a specific Bitcoin block was mined. Anyone can recompute the fingerprint of the file they hold with standard tools — sha256sum on any machine — and compare. Matching fingerprints mean the file is byte-for-byte what was delivered. A different fingerprint means it is not the same file.
- Doesn't that proof come from you? Why would a court trust it?
- That is the right question to ask, and it is why the timestamp is anchored to Bitcoin rather than to a log we control. We do not issue the proof or hold a key that could forge it, and the verification is done with the standard OpenTimestamps client rather than a checker we wrote. A tool that verifies its own vendor's evidence proves nothing.
- What does a seal not prove?
- It does not prove who created the file, that the footage depicts what the report says it depicts, or that anything in it is true. It proves that this exact file existed in this exact form at that time and has not changed since. Authorship and accuracy still come from the investigator and their testimony.
- Can you produce records if we subpoena them?
- The access log, the delivery record and the hold chain are ordinary business records and can be produced. The files themselves exist only while the case is live: once retention expires they are deleted from storage and cannot be restored by us or by anyone else. If material must survive, place it under legal hold before it expires.
- Our investigator's subscription lapsed. Is the held material gone?
- No. A case under legal hold cannot be deleted, so its storage continues after a subscription ends and is billed monthly until the hold is lifted. That is set out in the Terms of Service, because it is a cost someone has to carry and it should not be a surprise.
- We need our own account. Can a firm use this without an investigator?
- Yes. Everything above works the same whether the material came from a retained investigator or from your own file: upload it, send per-recipient links, seal it if it matters, and keep the record. Start with the free trial and use a real matter.
One thing this page will not claim
Nothing here is legal advice, and no vendor can promise you that a record will be admitted. What a timestamped fingerprint does is remove one argument from the table — whether the file in front of the court is the file that was delivered — and leave the rest to the witnesses. How you use that is your judgment, not ours.
Or read how the independent verification works, and what we do and do not claim about security.

